This might be the hardest prompt I’ve dealt with, mainly
because I don’t want to get into the media swirl of point of view, opinions, or
beliefs.
There’s so much being front-lined in the news about
political candidates, terrorism, racism, violence, gun control, undocumented
immigrants, global warming – you name it. Everyone has a point of view. It’s
hard not to get into the media foray and not have a concrete opinion. I can’t
seem to get past the “breaking” and “latest” reports and articles. It’s all so
over-examined. The viewpoints have been out there for so long and they are
hardly “new.” They have become like fruit left out: they are rotten and they
reek. Even my perspectives of world events seem a rehash of someone else’s. Really,
do I even have a new idea “bone” in my body? Or am I just a reflection of my
past, my environment, my biases and beliefs?
Our media is caught up in perspectives: I have a point of
view; you have a point of view; never the twain shall meet. Maybe the problem
is with the “point” in point of view. It is sharp and piercing. It wounds. It
is narrow. It seems adversarial and restrictive. And yes, the opposite
perspective, of course, is that it “points to.” The media would say that it zeros
in on issues that need attention. But are they focusing on what will really
transform society?
Of course it’s important to report on major events: the
Paris attacks, disturbing environmental trends, racism, graft. A free press is
critical.
Yet, I think that we as humans are missing something in our
media communications. We are missing something huge.
What might it look like for the media to think outside its current,
mostly turbulent box?
No comments:
Post a Comment